翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Laba ・ R v Labaye ・ R v Ladouceur ・ R v Latimer ・ R v AM ・ R v Andrews ・ R v Asante-Mensah ・ R v Askov ・ R v Attorney General for England and Wales ・ R v B ・ R v B (KG) ・ R v Badger ・ R v Bailey ・ R v Baillie ・ R v Barger ・ R v Bartle ・ R v Basi ・ R v Beaulac ・ R v Belnavis ・ R v Betts and Ridley ・ R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd ・ R v Birmingham City Council, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission ・ R v Blaue ・ R v Bonjon ・ R v Boucher ・ R v Bourke ・ R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Bartle ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Bartle ''R v Bartle'', () 3 S.C.R. 173 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to retain and instruct counsel under section 10(b) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''. The Court held that a police officer is required to hold off on their investigation upon arresting an individual until they have been informed of their rights and given sufficient information and access to contact a private lawyer or duty counsel. The case applied the earlier Supreme Court of Canada case, ''R v Brydges''. The judgment was released with three other decisions: ''R v Pozniak'', ''R v Harper'', ''R v Matheson'', and ''R v Prosper''. ==Background== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Bartle」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.